Dynamic theory of compromise: expediency and possible use in determining the structure of corporate capital

Korzh Natalia
Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Vinnytsa Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv national university of trade and economics, E-mail:norischuk@mail.ru

Cite this article:

Korzh N., (2015) Dynamic theory of compromise: expediency and possible use in determining the structure of corporate capital. Ed.: М.D. Baldzhy (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Systema pensiinoho zabezpechennia Ukrainy ta yevrointehratsiini protsesy; za red.: М. D. Baldzhy (gol. red.)], Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economics University, Odessa, No. 4(224), pp. 110-125.

Abstract

The processes of globalization, the transitive nature of the national economy and market imperfections, the lack of a unified approach to the definition of an optimal capital structure actualize the problem of adaptation to the optimal capital structure, the reasons for its deviations from the target values of financial leverage. Based on the analysis of the results of basic research in the context of the formation of strategies to change the capital structure, summarized and categorized institutional (dynamic) theory of capital structure. In the future, it will contribute to the effective management of them as Beams capital corporation.

Keywords

capital; capital structure; optimization of capital structure optimization factors, signal theory, recapitalization, marginal cost, marginal dohody.interesov; dynamic and statistical theory of capital structure.

JEL classification: O16

UD classification: 336.647.648

References

1. Mondher Bellalah and Charles Bouy. On Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium and Corporation Finance with Incomplete Information // International Journal Of Business, 10(2), 2005. – P. 134-150 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.craig.csufresno.edu/ijb/Volumes/ Volume% 2010 /V102-2.pdf
2. Гаркуша Н.М. Моделі і методи прийняття рішень в аналізі та аудиті: навч. посіб. / Н.М.Гаркуша, О.В.Цуканова, О.О. Горошанська. – К.: Знання, 2011. – 582 с.
3. Ross S.A. The Determination of Financial Structure. The Incentive–Signalling Approch // Bell Journal of Economics, 1977. Spring. P.23-40.
4. Kevin Rock. Why New Issues are Underpriced // Journal of Financial Economics 15 (1986) 187-212. North-Holland. P. 187-212, Р.206. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www 2.bc.edu /thomas-chemmanur/phdfincorp/MF891%20papers/rock% 201986.pdf].
5. Welch I. Seasoned Offering, Imitation Costs and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offering // Journal of Finance, V. 44, Issue 2 (June 1989), P. 421-449 [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.ivo-welch.info/research/journalcopy/1989-jf.pdf
6. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1 (Jan., 1989), pp. 57-74/http://www.jstor.org/ stable/pdfplus/ 258191. pdf?acceptTC=true;
7. Michael C. Jensen. Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers // American Economic Review, Vol. 76, 2, May, 1986, Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=99580
8. Stulz R. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control / R. Stulz //Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, vol. 20, issue 1-2, pages 25-54 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfinec/v_3a20_3ay_3a1988_3ai_3a_3ap_3a25-54.htm]
9. Milton Harris, Artur Raviv. The Theory of Capital Structure / H. Milton, A. Raviv //The Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 1. (Mar., 1991), pp. 297-355. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/958/126/1231/harris_raviv_-_cs_1991.pdf]
10. Merton H. Miller, Kevin Rock. Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information. // The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 4. (Sep., 1985), pp. 1031-1051.
11. Myers S.C., Maijluf N. Copporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do not Have // Journal of Financial Economics/ 1984. June. P/187-221.
12. Harris M., Raviv A. Control of Corporate Decisions: Shareholders vs. Management. / M. Harris, A. Raviv // Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(11), pp. 4115-47. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/11/4115.abstract.
13. Harris M., Raviv A. A Theory of Board Control and Size. / M. Harris, A. Raviv // Review of Financial Studies, 2008, 21(4), pp. 1797-832. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/4/1797 та ін.].
14. Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey Wurgler. Market Timing and Capital Structure // The Journal of Finance. Vol. LVII, №1 Feb. 2002 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/researchcomputing/workshops/papers/Baker_Wurgler_CapitalStructure_JF_Feb2002.pdf .
15. Robert C. Merton. On Market Timing and Investment Performance/ I. An Equilibrium Theory of Value for Market Forecasts // Journal of Business, Volume 54, Issue 3 (Jul., 1981), P. 363-406 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.people. hbs.edu/ rmerton/Simple% 20model% 20of% 20Capital%20Market.pdf.
16. Roy D. Henriksson, Robert C. Merton. On Market Timing and Investment Performance. II. Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Forecasting Skills // Journal of Business, Volume 54, Issue 4 (Oct, 1981), P. 513-533. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.people. hbs.edu/ rmerton /onmarkettimingpart2.pdf]
17. Рогатенюк Э.В. Концептуальные подходы к оптимизации финансовой структуры капитала предприятий / Э.В. Рогатенюк, О.Н. Зеленская // Экономика и управление. – №5. – 2013. – С.121-127.