Innovative labor and innovative work behavior: essence and management impact factors

Nikiforenko Valery
Doctore of Еconomic Sciences, Professor, Odessa National Economic University. E-mail:nikiforenko@te.net.ua

Cite this article:

Nikiforenko V., (2019) Innovative labor and innovative work behavior: essence and management impact factors. Ed.: М.D. Baldzhy (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Systema pensiinoho zabezpechennia Ukrainy ta yevrointehratsiini protsesy; za red.: М. D. Baldzhy (gol. red.)], Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economics University, Odessa, No. 1(264), pp. 114-135.

Abstract

The article summarizes and systematizes the results of research of domestic and foreign scientists regarding the interpretation and the relationship between the concepts of “innovative work”, “innovative labor behavior” and “innovative activity”. New imperatives of labor as a process and resource are highlighted, which become the immanent component of the new economy and post-industrial society. Proved the impossibility of identifying intellectual work with intellectual work to perform the relevant functions. The necessity of the obligatory presence of creativity and creativity, as components of innovative labor, and a certain environment with interrelated factors - knowledge, desire, ability to apply it and needs in it is proved. Defined a clear idea of the concept of "innovative activity" and its differences from the concept of "innovative labor". Proved the need to take into account the latent results of scientific research, which can be claimed later in other areas as components of innovative labor. The important difference between innovative labor, namely the fact that it is not amenable to regulation, accurate forecasting, rationing and control is determined; there are no standards for it; he has a high degree of risk. Highlighted the need to create a favorable environment: the appropriate organization and management of the innovation process to ensure the desired innovative behavior of enterprise personnel. It has been determined that in this system of innovative labor management, the object is human resources, and the subject is the use and development of creative, innovative abilities and innovative behavior of personnel. It has been proven that the innovative behavior of employees and the process that motivates such behavior are crucial in ensuring high-performance innovative labor. It has been determined that at the present stage of economic development, the emphasis in research is shifting towards social and psychophysiological tools of managerial influence on innovative labor behavior as the basis for effective innovative labor. Organizational (observational behavior, organizational culture, socio-psychological climate and support for innovation) and individual (inclination for innovation, interest, orientation skills, self-efficacy) factors influencing effective innovative labor behavior are highlighted. The positive and negative impact of innovation on the innovative labor behavior of a person is determined. The author's vision of the further directions of research of the influence of innovative labor and the corresponding innovative labor behavior on the development of human potential is presented.

Keywords

innovative work, management of innovative labor, innovative activity, innovative work behavior, organizational and individual factors of managerial influence.

JEL classification: J 280; DOI: 10.32680/2409-9260-2019-1-264-114-135

UD classification: 005.591.6

References

1. Колот А. М. Розвиток науки про працю і соціально-трудові відносини та її роль у переформатизації та формуванні сучасного економічного мислення // Україна: аспекти праці. – 2012. – № 6. – С. 3-10
2. Колот А.М. Інноваційна праця та інтелектуальний капітал у системі факторів формування економіки знань // Економічна теорія. – 2007. – № 2. – С. 3-13
3. Колот А.М. Розвиток наук про працю та соціально-трудові відносини на засадах міждисциплінарності // Соціально-трудові відносини: теорія та практика. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 7-25
4. Колот А.М. Соціально-трудова сфера: стан відносин, нові виклики, тенденції розвитку: монографія. – Київ: КНЕУ. – 2010. – 284 с.
5. Колот А.М. Инновационный труд как тренд новой экономики [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/24741?mode=full
6. Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2): 245-254
7. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36
8. Dörner, N., Gassmann, O., & Morhart, F. (2012). innovative work behavior: the roles of employee expectations and effects on job performance (Doctoral dissertation)
9. Dorenbosch, L., Engen, M. L. V., & Verhagen, M. (2005). on􀌺the􀌺job innovation: the impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and innovation management, 14(2), 129-141
10. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 73,287-302
11. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., and West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25, 129–145
12. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organisations
13. Parker, S.K., Williams, H.M. & Turner, N. (2006). Моделирование предшествующих проактивного поведения в Работа. Журнал прикладной психологии, 91 (3), 636-652
14. Беклешов В.К., Завлин П.Н. Нормирование в научно-технических организациях. – М.: Экономика, 1989. – 240 с.
15. К.Ф.Пузиня. Нормирование труда специалистов НИИ и КБ: межотраслевые методические рекомендации. – Москва: Экономика,1990.– 142 с.
16. Стремоусова Е.Г. Сущность категории инновационный труд / Научный электоронный архив URL: http://econf.rae.ru/article/7994.
17. Белокрылова О.С. Теория инновационной экономики: учебник – Ростов на Дону: Феникс, 2009, с.53
18. Бережнов Г.В. Креативность и инновации в деятельности предприятия. Российское предпринимательство № 4. - 2006. – С.42- 49
19. Закон України «Про інноваційну діяльність» від 04.07.2002 № 40-IV, Редакція від 05.12.2012
20. Керівництво Осло. Рекомендації щодо збору та аналізу даних стосовно інновацій / Організація економічного співробітництва та розвитку. - 3-тє вид.; пер. з англ. - К., 2009. - 163 с. ISBN 978-966-479-016-8
21. Федулова І.В. Управління розвитком інноваційного потенціалу підприємств хлібопекарної промисловості: автореф. дис. …д. е. н.: спец. 08.00.04; Нац. ун-т харч. технологій. – К., 2009. – 35 с.
22. Тычинский А.В. Управление инновационной деятельностью компаний: современные подходы, алгоритмы, опыт. Таганрог: ТРТУ. – 2006. – 233 с.
23. Інноваційна діяльність підприємства та економічна сутність інноваційного процесу [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: www.vestnik-econom.mgu.od.ua/journal/2015/12.../26.pdf
24. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W. (2010). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342
25. Scott S.G. and Bruce R.A. (1994).Determinants of innovative behaviour: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 580-607
26. Leong C.T, Rasli A. The Relationship between innovative work behavior on work role performance: An empirical study – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014 – Elsevier
27. Carmeli A. Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work - CiteSeerX
28. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organisations
29. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2012). The new frontier of experience innovation. Image.
30. Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B and Strange JM (2002). Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership. 13: 705–750
31. West. MA. (1989).Innovation amongst health care professional., Social Behaviour, 4,173-184.32
32. Sessa, V. I., Finley, A., & Gullu, B. (2011). 15 Learning linkages and flows between individuals, groups, and the organisation: creating programs to foster student engagement in learning. The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning, 209
33. Hülsheger, Ute R., Neil Anderson, and Jesus F. Salgado. 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 1128
34. Oldham, Greg R., and Anne Cummings. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal 39: 607–34
35. Korzilius, Hubert, Joost J. L. E. Bücker, and Sophie Beerlage. 2017. Multiculturalism and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 56: 13–24
36. Carmeli, Abraham, and Gretchen M. Spreitzer. 2009. Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior 43: 169–91
37. Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M., and Graen, G.B. (1999): An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships, Personnel Psychology, 52 (3), 591-620
38. Basu, R. and Green, S.G. (1997): Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership: An Empirical Examination of Innovative Behaviors in Leader-Member Dyads, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (6), 477-499
39. Axtell, C.M., Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K.L., and Wall, T.D. (2000): Shopfloor Innovation: Facilitating the Suggestion and Implementation of Ideas, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73 (3), 265-285
40. De Jong, J.P.J. and Kemp, R. (2003): Determinants of Co-workers’ Innovative Behaviour: An Investigation Into Knowledge Intensive Services, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (2), 189-212
41. Van der Vegt, G.S. and Janssen, O. (2003): Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation, Journal of Management, 29 (5), 729-751
42. Bunce, D. and West, M.A. (1995): Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44 (3), 199-215
43. Janssen, O. and van Yperen, N.W. (2004): Employees’ Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3), 368-384
44. Dorenbosch, L., van Engen, M.L., and Verhagen, M. (2005): On-the-job Innovation: The Impact of Job Design and Human Resource Management trough Production Ownership, Creativity and Innovation Management, 14 (2), 129-141
45. Bandura, A. (1997): Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman
46. Farr, J.L. and Ford, C.M. (1990): Individual Innovation. In West, M.A., and Farr, J.L. (Eds.): Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (63-80), Chichester: Wiley