Strategic vectors of the countrys economic development in the post-war

Кniazieva Оlena
D.Sc.(Economics), Professor, Senior researcher, Professor of the Department of Economics and digital business State University of Intelligent Technologies and Telecommunications, Odessa, E-mail:7234275@gmail.com, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-0637

Cite this article:

Кniazieva О. (2022) Strategic vectors of the countrys economic development in the post-war. Ed.: V.V. Kovalenko (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Stratehichni vektory ekonomichnoho rozvytku krainy u pisliavoiennyi chas; za red.: V.V. Kovalenko (gol. red.)], Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economics University, Odessa, No. 3-4 (292-293), pp. 94-100.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to form strategic vectors of economic development of the country in the postwar period and to determine the place and role of the army in this development. To achieve this goal, a number of general scientific methods of cognition were used, in particular dialectical cognition, morphological analysis, scientific abstraction, etc. It is established that today in the field of army financing the emphasis is on manpower, technical equipment and assistance from partner countries. The analysis of statistical data allows us to state that the number of manpower and equipment does not guarantee the total military capacity, so for the effective development of the armed forces the emphasis should be on technological and innovative advantages, improving quality, hall efficiency, sustainable partnerships and more. Ukraine needs a radical change in its self-defense strategy, which should include an economic component aimed at initiating innovative renewal and development of the defense complex. In turn, the innovative development of the army can become a locomotive of innovative development of the economy as a whole. An example of successful implementation of such a strategy is Israel, the expediency of which is based on certain analogies in the current state of security, namely: significant numerical advantage of opponents, relative lack of strategic depth, permanent regional instability, the need to rely on their own strength. The practical value of the study is to determine the primary vectors of the strategy of further postwar development, they include: dominance in qualitative indicators; conversion and transfer of technologies from the military sphere to the socio-economic and industrial life of the country; development of intellectual potential and improvement of the training system, early prevention of conflict or local incident; formation of investment-attractive sectors of the economy based on technological dominance obtained as a result of technology transfer; finding and developing optimal models of partnership in order to accelerate the post-war reconstruction of the country. In further research it is planned to conduct research in the direction of forming a roadmap for the implementation of the proposed vectors of development.

Keywords

post-war economic development, strategy, innovations, technology transfer.

JEL classification:L100, О310; DOI:10.32680/2409-9260-2022-3-4-292-293-94-100

UD classification:338.245

References

1. Military Security Strategy of Ukraine. Retried from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/121/2021#Text (accessed April 06, 2022). [in Ukrainian].
2. Turkot, M. (2016). National military component security of Ukraine. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi prokuratury Ukrayiny, 2, 44-50. [in Ukrainian].
3. Oliynyk, L.V. (2017). Methodical system of teaching military-special disciplines of masters of military-social management: monograph. Khmelnytsky: Publishing House NASBSU. [in Ukrainian].
4. Viter, D., Oliferuk, V. (2021). Conception of the military education system’s development in the Ukraine. Viysʹkova osvita, 2 (44), 29-42. [in Ukrainian].
5. Bloshchynsky, I.G. (2016). Theory and practice of professional training of specialists of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine with the use of distance learning technologies. monograph Khmelnytskyi: Publishing House NASBSU. [in Ukrainian].
6. Kravchenko, V. (2019). Military economics and military finance: new challenges in the first half of XXI century. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 9, 4-11. [in Ukrainian].
7. The military budget for 2021. Retried from https://www.ukrmilitary.com/2020/12/ budget2021.html. (accessed April 06, 2022). [in Ukrainian].
8. Official site of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. Retried from http://www. ukrstat.gov.ua. (accessed April 14, 2022). [in Ukrainian].
9. Ranking of countries by number of military. Retried from https://nonews.co/directory/ lists/countries/number-military. (accessed April 06, 2022). [in Ukrainian].
10. Rating of military power of the world. Retried from https://nonews.co/directory/lists/ countries/global-firepower (accessed April 06, 2022). [in Ukrainian].
11. Braude, M., Deger, S., Sen, S. (2013). Defence, Innovation and Development: the Case of Israel. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 12, 37-57. Retried from ttp://www. cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2013 (accessed April 06, 2022).
12. National Economic Strategy for the period up to 2030. Retried from https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-%D0%BF#n25. (accessed April 06, 2022). [in Ukrainian].