Research on the development of rulal areas Transcarpathian region in the terms of European integration processes

Bochko Olena
Doctor of Economics, Professor Department of Marketing and Logistics, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, E-mail:bochkoolena@ukr.net, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-4654

Cite this article:

Bochko O. (2022) Research on the development of rulal areas transcarpathian region in the terms of European integration processes. Ed.: V.V. Kovalenko (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Doslidzhennia rozvytku silskykh terytorii Zakarpatskoi oblasti v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv; za red.: V.V. Kovalenko (gol. red.)], Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economics University, Odessa, No. 7 (296), pp. 17-22.

Abstract

The article's purpose is to justify the research results on the development of rural areas of Zakarpattia Oblast in the context of European integration processes. In the research process, the following were used: general scientific and unique forms of scientific knowledge; monographic - for the development of professional publications on the specified issues; logical - for the analysis of cooperation agreements of territorial communities; statistical and comparative - for analytical calculations of rural districts of Zakarpattia Oblast for 2021; system approach - to make proposals for the development of rural areas. The rural areas of the Transcarpathian region for 2021 were studied. It was established that within the Zakarpattia region, the largest population is the Khust district with 267,333 people and an area of 3,180.3 km2, and the smallest is Rakhiv district with 82,397 people and 1,843.7 km2. It has been established that active work is being done toward strategic aspects of international cooperation within the Transcarpathian region. It is substantiated that among the nine cooperation agreements concluded by the communities of the Transcarpathian region, common areas of cooperation are joint projects and delegation of powers in the spheres of providing social, communal, and tourist services and improvement of municipal management in the field of architecture. Areas of concern remain education, information, and communication, IT technologies and other modern technologies, improvement of municipal administration, energy-saving infrastructure, prevention of artificial and other disasters, and introduction of energyefficient technologies. Accordingly, there is a need to disseminate information about the possibilities of educational directions for developing territorial communities. From the beginning of 2022, 2 cooperation agreements of territorial communities have already been concluded, depending on the interested spheres of activity. The practical significance of the research results lies in the fact that the research results can be used in developing strategic directions for developing rural areas of the Transcarpathian region.

Keywords

rural areas, Transcarpathian region, cooperation, territorial communities, European integration processes.

JEL classification: О130, R110, O440; DOI: 10.32680/2409-9260-2022-7-296-17-22

UD classification: 631:331.522.4

References

1. Andriiuk M.V. (2015) Finansove zabezpechennia rozvytku silskykh terytorii v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh vyklykiv. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky. [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
2. Hubeni Yu. (2007) Rozvytok silskykh terytorii: deiaki aspekty yevropeiskoi teorii i praktyky. Ekonomika Ukrainy. No 4. P. 62–70.
3. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy Retrieved from: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/./ archive/7-2015/135.pdf [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
4. Ekonomika APK. Zakarpatska oblasna viiskova administratsiia Retrieved from: https:// carpathia.gov.ua/diyalnist/agropromislovist/ekonomika-apk [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
5. Iermolenko V.M. (2010) Osoblyvosti formuvannia katehorii «stalyi rozvytok silskykh terytorii». Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka. com.ua/index.php?operation=1&iid=201[in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
6. Zaiats T. A. (2017). Rozvytok silskykh poselen Ukrainy v umovakh detsentralizatsii: mozhlyvosti ta ryzyky. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika. 3. . P. 48-60. Retrieved from: http:// nbu [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
7. Zvit za rezultatamy ekspertnoho analitychnoho doslidzhennia pytan spivpratsi hromad Zakarpatskoi oblasti Retrieved from: https://decentralization.gov.ua [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
8. Malik M.I. (2008) Do pytannia staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii. Ekonomika APK. No 5. P. 51-55.
9. Predstavnyky prohramy U-LEAD z Yevropoiu dopomahaiut Vilkhovetskii hromadi u modernizatsii novoho prymishchennia TsNAP Retrieved from: https://vilhovecka.gromada.org. ua/news/1564475239 [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
10. Prokopa I. (2007) Silski terytorii Ukrainy: doslidzhennia i rehuliuvannia rozvytku. Ekonomika Ukrainy. № 6 (547). С. 50-59
11. Borshchevskyi V.V. (2012) Rozvytok silskykh terytorii v systemi yevrointehratsiinykh priorytetiv Ukrainy: monohrafiia. NAN Ukrainy. In-t rehionalnykh doslidzhen; nauk. red.. Lviv, 2012. 216 с.
12. Sabluk P.T. (2005). Rozvytok silskykh terytorii v konteksti zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi stabilnosti derzhavy. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy rozvytku ukrainskoho sela i silskykh terytorii: mater. VII richnykh zboriv Vseukrainskoho konhresu vchenykh ekonomistiv-ahrarnykiv К., 19 с.
13. Syniak D. (2022) Mizhmunitsypalne dyvo. 16 hromad Zakarpattia razom buduiut smittiesortuvalnyi zavod Retrieved from: https://decentralization.gov.ua/news/14600). [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).
14. Storonianska I. Z., Zalutskyi I. R., Patytska Kh. O. (2021). Silski terytorii v Ukraini: praktyka identyfikatsii ta instrumenty rozvytku: naukovoanalitychna dopovid. Lviv, DU «instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy».137 p. (Seriia «Problemy rehionalnoho rozvytku»)
15. Iurchyshyn V.V. (2005). Silski terytorii yak systemoutvoriuiuchi faktory rozvytku ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky. Ekonomika APK. No3 (125). P. 3-10.
16. Antoniuk N., Perkhach O. & Bochko O. (2021). Decentralization of rural areas through publicprivate partnership [Decentralization of rural areas through publicprivate partnership]. Scientific Papers: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture & Rural Development, 21(1). Vol. 21, Issue 1, P. 55-65.
17. Hotra V. (2021) Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas [Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas]. Global J.Environ. Sci. Manage. 7(2): 155-170. DOI: 10.22034/gjesm.2021.02.01.
18. Stocker G. (1997): “Public-private partnerships and urban governance”, in Partners in Urban Governance: European and American experiences, ed. G. Stocker, pag. 1-21, Mac Millan, London
19. Decentralization in Ukraine. Retrieved from: http: decentralization,gov,ua/region [in Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2022).