The paradigm of differentiation in rural development: a financial perspective

Bochko Olena
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the Department of Marketing and Logistics, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, E-mail:bochkoolena@ukr.net, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-4654

Bochko Oleksandr
PhD in Economics , Associate Professor, National Environmental University, Dubliany, E-mail:bochko25@ukr.net, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000‐0001‐8297‐2783

Liubka Vitalii
postgraduate student Department of marketing and logistic, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, E-mail:lubka1980@gmail.com, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-1561

Cite this article:

Bochko O., Bochko O., Liubka V. (2023) The paradigm of differentiation in rural development: a financial perspective. Ed.: V.V. Kovalenko (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Paradyhma dyferentsiatsii rozvytku silskykh terytorii z urakhuvanniam finansovoho aspektu; za red.: V.V. Kovalenko (gol. red.)], Scientific Bulletin of the Odesa National Economic University (ISSN 2313-4569), Odesa National Economics University, Odesa, No. 11-12 (312-313), pp. 184-191.

Abstract

The article examines the level of revenues to the budgets of territorial communities in Zakarpattia Oblast. The level of revenues to the district budgets of territorial communities within the general and special funds is substantiated. Analysis of indicators of revenues from rural territorial communities to the budget of Zakarpattia Oblast allows us to note the low level of revenues to budgets from rural territorial communities in Uzhgorod district. Investigating receipts from various districts of Zakarpattia Oblast, we observe the highest level of income in the third quarter of 2021 in Uzhgorod, Khust, and Mukachevo districts. In the article, the differentiation of rural areas is carried out, taking into account the financial aspect. Three groups of districts are established: the first consists of Uzhhorod and Mukachiv districts; the second group consists of Khust and Berehiv districts, and the third group consists of Tyachiv and Rakhiv districts. For the short-term perspective, for the second group of districts, we suggest following the strategy for the development of mountainous territories. This proposal is related to the adoption of the Concept for the Development of the Mountain Territories of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Within the first and second groups, we suggest compliance with the Strategy for the Development of Territorial Communities. For the first, second, and third groups, from a strategic perspective, we suggest paying attention to cross-border cooperation, since Uzhgorod district borders Slovakia, Berehiv district borders Hungary, and Rakhiv district borders Romania. This will stimulate the activation of socio-economic, ecological, innovative, scientific, and technical directions of territorial development. The purpose of writing the article is to propose differentiation in the development of rural areas, taking into account the financial aspect. To achieve the specified goal, the following research methods were used: inductive, deductive — research of the level of revenues to the budgets of territorial communities of the Transcarpathian region; the graphic method was used to visually display the specified dynamics in the section of districts. The abstract-logical method was used to summarize the results.

Keywords

territorial communities, differentiation, rural areas, budget, finances.

JEL classification: M310; DOI: https://doi.org/10.32680/2409-9260-2023-11-12-312-313-184-191

UD classification: 332.1:338.2

References

1. Andriiuk M.V. (2015) Finansove zabezpechennia rozvytku silskykh terytorii v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh vyklykiv. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, 7. Retried from http://global-national.in.ua/issue-7-2015/15-vipusk-7-veresen-2015-r/1305-andriyuk-m-vfinansove-zabezpechennya-rozvitku-silskikh-teritorij-v-umovakh-evrointegratsijnikh-viklikiv [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed September 12, 2023).
2. Bochko O. (2022). Research on the development of rural areas transcarpathian region in the terms of european integration processes. Naukovyy visnyk Odesʹkoho natsionalʹnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu, 7 (296), 17-22. Retried from: http://n-visnik.oneu.edu.ua/archive. php [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
3. Hertseh V. (2019). Financial complex providing infrastruktural development of rural territories. Visnyk UzhNU, 26, 1, 46-49. [Іn Ukrainian]
4. Demianyshyna O.A. (2011). Ways of development and increase financing of rural territorial communities competitiveness. Visnyk Poltavskoy derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi, 2. Retried from: http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/chem_biol/nppdaa/econ/2011_2_3/352.pdf [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
5. Decentralization. Retrieved from: http: decentralization,gov,ua/region [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
6. Zablodska, I. V. and Hrechana, S. I. (2021). Methodological Support for the Formation of the Identification Profile of the Territorial Community. Rehionalʹna ekonomika, 2(100), 5-14. DOI: 10.36818/1562-0905-2021-2-1. [Іn Ukrainian]
7. Official website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Retried from: http://www.ukrstat. gov.ua/ [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
8. Panov A. The new administrative-territorial structure of Transcarpathia: specifics, risks and opportunities. (2020). Retried from: https://varosh.com.ua/dumky/novyj-administratyvnoterytorialnyj-ustrij-zakarpattya-speczyfika-ryzyky-ta-mozhlyvosti [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
9. Pastukh K. Strategic development planning of territorial communities. Naukovyy visnyk:Derzhupravlinnya, 1(7), 195–215. Retried from: https://doi.org/10.32689/2618-0065-2021-1(7)- 195-215 [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
10. Plyhach K. D. Marchenko O. (2019) Financial support of rural areas development in cherkasy region. Halytsʹkyy ekonomichnyy visnyk,. 57, 2, 124-131 [Іn Ukrainian].
11. On the approval of the Concept for the development of the mountainous territories of the Ukrainian Carpathians. (2019) Order of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 232 April 3. Retried from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/prijnyato-koncepciyu-rozvitku-girskih-teritorij-ukrayinskihkarpat-gennadij-zubko -[Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
12. Poltorak A. (2020). Organization of Socio-Economic Development of Territorial Communities. Elektronne naukove vydannya z ekonomichnykh nauk "Modern Economics", 33, 88-98 Retried from: https://modecon.mnau.edu.ua [Іn Ukrainian] (accessed December 12, 2023).
13. Sabluk P.T. (2005). Rozvytok silskykh terytorii v konteksti zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi stabilnosti derzhavy. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy rozvytku ukrainskoho sela i silskykh terytorii: mater. VII richnykh zboriv Vseukrainskoho konhresu vchenykh ekonomistiv-ahrarnykiv [Іn Ukrainian]
14. Chuhno I.A. (2015). Definition of sources of financial and economic provision of state management for the development of rural areas in modern conditions. Effective economy. – LLC "DSC-Center", Retried from: hhttp://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=389 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 12 July 2023).
15. Yurchyshyn V.V. (2005). Rural territories as system formative factors of development of agrarian sector of economy. Ekonomika APK, 3, 125, 3-10. [Іn Ukrainian]
16. Antoniuk N., Perkhach O. & Bochko O. (2021). Decentralization of rural areas through publicprivate partnership. Scientific Papers: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture & Rural Development, 21(1), 21,1, 55-65. [Іn Romania].
17. Hotra V. (2021) Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas. Global J.Environ. Sci. Manage, 7(2), 155-170. DOI: 10.22034/gjesm.2021.02.01. [In Tehran].